No I get it, but if you feel like insulting my intelligence once more feel free to do so. What I don’t understand is:
1. Why you feel your population is assumed healthy when deer are free ranging, when an infected deer can look normal
2. Why you can’t admit you wouldn’t eat a known infected deer, but rather attack me.
Exposure is one thing but actively ingesting it is another.
the point is, if you say no you wouldn’t eat it then all the scientific data you put in her YOU don’t stand by and your point is moot.
I think I know the answer, but probably won’t get it.