Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just kidding around but your comment makes me think of diopter lenses that canon used to use...might be a million dollar idea. I know I can’t see the screen without my readers

Posted

Never knew that would happen. Sad. I have thousands of dollars of older tackle that I will take better care of.  I catch plenty of fish , will NEVER pay $15.00 for a lure.  Unless its one of D. Dotys and then it would be a display item.  :D

Posted
On June 2, 2020 at 9:29 PM, Deadstream said:

Never knew that would happen. Sad. I have thousands of dollars of older tackle that I will take better care of.  I catch plenty of fish , will NEVER pay $15.00 for a lure.  Unless its one of D. Dotys and then it would be a display item.  :D

Ooops, I lied. I have thousands of dollars of Salmon and Lake Trout lures for the Great Lakes that cost way... over $15.00.  I don't even want to know how much.   Dang, I'm tackle rich and cash poor.  

Posted

This is a weird post.  I guess you could tank test every one to check for action, but those are trash.  If you didn't drop 700 dollars at tacklewarehouse you probably wouldn't feel the urge to sell your ruined lures.  🤣

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.