MOPanfisher Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 I thought the Goven mentioned was gong to ban "Tick Talk" but here we are. ColdWaterFshr 1
gotmuddy Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 IMO there is only one version of the 'Rona, because the person who came into work sick and gave it to me had many symptoms, and I had Zero(also known as none, "0", zilch, nada). The difference between her and It is likely not even in my control, but I like to think its because I take care of my immune system(zinc, vitamin C/D). Anyone who has looked at the numbers of sick/deaths could see that unlike the "spanish flu" this disproportionately attacks the very elderly and the immuno-compromised. It makes considerably more sense for the people at high risk to quarantine/isolate, and the healthy people to GET the virus so it can burn through the population. fishinwrench 1 everything in this post is purely opinion and is said to annoy you.
Daryk Campbell Sr Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 11 hours ago, fishinwrench said: How so? Thousands get bitten by ticks....and a few die, or get extremely ill. Thousands get infected with Covid.....and a few die, or get extremely ill. Relating the infection to the amount of severe reaction isn't really THAT insane, is it? If everyone in the country played in the woods equally then the numbers would likely be parallel. Valid point. Obvious difference is, we can choose to play in the woods, or not. Those who are infected with tick born diseases are not able to transmit the disease. But, I do understand the logic. Johnsfolly and fishinwrench 1 1 Money is just ink and paper, worthless until it switches hands, and worthless again until the next transaction. (me) I am the master of my unspoken words, and the slave to those that should have remained unsaid. (unknown)
Chief Grey Bear Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 28 minutes ago, Daryk Campbell Sr said: Valid point. Obvious difference is, we can choose to play in the woods, or not. Those who are infected with tick born diseases are not able to transmit the disease. But, I do understand the logic. That’s why it’s not logical. Please don’t encourage him.🤣🤣 Chief Grey Bear Living is dangerous to your health Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors
Ketchup Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 Just heard on the radio that getting the rona could have long term effects on men, potentially causing E.D. Some of you don’t need to worry, but you others better start wearing your mask. Mitch f 1 TinBoats BassClub. An aluminum only bass club. If interested in info send me a PM.
gotmuddy Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 52 minutes ago, Daryk Campbell Sr said: Valid point. Obvious difference is, we can choose to play in the woods, or not. Those who are infected with tick born diseases are not able to transmit the disease. But, I do understand the logic. Actually now that I think about it, his theory makes more sense. If your high risk, stay home. tjm 1 everything in this post is purely opinion and is said to annoy you.
FishnDave Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 My sister and her husband both had it. Their only symptoms were a day or so of feeling lethargic, and losing their senses of taste & smell for a day or so. She said people with Type O- blood don't seem to be bothered as much by the virus. I'm not O-...
snagged in outlet 3 Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 11 minutes ago, FishnDave said: My sister and her husband both had it. Their only symptoms were a day or so of feeling lethargic, and losing their senses of taste & smell for a day or so. She said people with Type O- blood don't seem to be bothered as much by the virus. I'm not O-... I'm O! FishnDave 1
FishnDave Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/89117 and https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.11.20031096v2 Uh-oh...I'm A.
moguy1973 Posted December 8, 2020 Posted December 8, 2020 2 hours ago, gotmuddy said: Actually now that I think about it, his theory makes more sense. If your high risk, stay home. It makes absolutely no sense on how the two diseases spread. One tick isn't going to spread Lyme disease or RMSF to more than one person. Put it this way, for 10 people to get Lyme disease or RMSF, there has to be 10 ticks since ticks die shortly after they fall off and won't bite twice. For 10 people to get COVID19, there only has to be 1 person that has it to give it to the rest. And then those 10 people can spread it to 10 more people each for 100 people, and those 100 people can spread it to 10 more each for 1000 people, etc. It really is apples to oranges. The only similarity is if you walk into the woods that contains no ticks you won't get a tick bite. Same as if you walk into a store and no one inside isn't infected with COVID19 you aren't going to get COVID19. snagged in outlet 3 1 -- JimIf people concentrated on the really important things in life, there'd be a shortage of fishing poles. -- Doug Larson
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now