House moves to repeal the Pittman-Robertson act.

[top_dollar]

13 hours ago, fshndoug said:

Maybe they will send out a bonus check to all that are too lazy to work. By the way how many accidents have been caused by people on MaryJane .You never ever hear about that stat.

What are you even talking about?  Are you on the wrong thread?  Maybe you should lay off the MaryJane...

[Quillback]

Let's keep it civil, if you want it to remain open.

[fishinwrench]

2 hours ago, Terrierman said:

Well there you go wrench.  Happy now that you know the move has zero to do with agencies wasting their money?  You should know by now that these sorts of efforts are nearly always craven in their origins.

There I go????   There I go what? 

I'm afraid that MoCarps post about the firearms agreement in Australia just confuses me more.  

Par for the course...... Let's create confusion first and foremost. 🙄

[Terrierman]

7 hours ago, fishinwrench said:

There I go????   There I go what? 

I'm afraid that MoCarps post about the firearms agreement in Australia just confuses me more.  

Par for the course...... Let's create confusion first and foremost. 🙄

Let me simplify then.  The effort has nothing to do with concern about the money being misspent.  It's a group of Republican congressmen pretending to be concerned about 2A rights.

Clear enough now?

[MOPanfisher]

What??? Politicians doing something pointless simply to enhance their election potential or raise money.  There's a shocker.

[fishinwrench]

4 hours ago, Terrierman said:

Let me simplify then.  The effort has nothing to do with concern about the money being misspent.  It's a group of Republican congressmen pretending to be concerned about 2A rights.

Clear enough now?

Well if the move, effort, change, or whatever you wanna call it, is aimed at protecting 2A rights, then what's the problem?    I thought everyone here was pro 2A.  

[gotmuddy]

9 hours ago, fishinwrench said:

Well if the move, effort, change, or whatever you wanna call it, is aimed at protecting 2A rights, then what's the problem?    I thought everyone here was pro 2A.  

wrong.

 

I support repealing this tax as a federal tax, because the states can then tax as they see fit.  I am 100% for giving as many rights back to states to decide as possible.

[Terrierman]

9 hours ago, fishinwrench said:

Well if the move, effort, change, or whatever you wanna call it, is aimed at protecting 2A rights, then what's the problem?    I thought everyone here was pro 2A.  

It's not.

[Gavin]

The Pittman-Robertson was established in 1937. Tell me where it's put a significant burden on anyone's 2A rights? Well you cant...because it doesn't. Plus the SCOTUS has your 2A back. It's just a money grab, effort to defund conservation and stick more land in the hands of big Ag. 

[Johnsfolly]

1 hour ago, Gavin said:

stick more land in the hands of big Ag. 

aka Bill Gates😠

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2022-06-30/north-dakota-ag-clears-farmland-purchase-tied-to-bill-gates